Related questions. Who was on trial in the scopes monkey trial? What was the Scopes trial about? What the authors of inherit the wind say about their play and the scopes trial? Who was the judge at the scopes monkey trial? What divisions in American society were reflected in the scopes trial?
Where did the Scopes Trial happen? How did the law change after the Scopes trial? Who was a supporter of free speech in the Scopes trial? What or who was on trial in the Monkey trial? What did the Tennessee court decide in scopes trial?
What trial was about evolution? What describes the possible outcomes of any single trial of a ninomial distribution experiment? What was the outcome of the scopes monkey trial? What does Scopes trial mean? What did the tennessee courts decide in the scopes trial?
Why was the scopes trial known as the monkey trial? What did the Tennessee court decide in the scopes trial in the scops triel? What was the legacy of the scopes trial? What was the outcome of the trial of the biology teacher John Scopes? How did the scopes trial end? Why was John Scopes on trial? Why was the scopes trial also known as the monkey trial?
When did the Scopes Monkey Trial end? What is another name for the scopes trial? Who wins the scopes trial? Study Guides. Trending Questions. What is the fourth element of the periodic table of elements? Still have questions? Find more answers. Bryan and Darrow set the tone by immediately attacking each other in the press.
The ACLU attempted to remove Darrow from the case, fearing they would lose control, but none of these efforts worked. The grand jury met on May 9, In preparation, Scopes recruited and coached students to testify against him.
Three of the seven students attending were called to testify, each showing a sketchy understanding of evolution. The case was pushed forward and a trial set for July Bryan arrived in Dayton three days before the trial, stepping off a train to the spectacle of half the town greeting him. He posed for photo opportunities and gave two public speeches, stating his intention to not only defend the anti-evolution law but to use the trial to debunk evolution entirely.
The trial day started with crowds pouring into the courthouse two hours before it was scheduled to begin, filling up the room and causing onlookers to spill into the hallways. There was applause when Bryan entered the court and further when he and Darrow shook hands. The trial began — somewhat ironically — with a lengthy prayer. Outside the courthouse a circus-like atmosphere reigned, with barbecues, concessions and carnival games, though that died down as the trial was adjourned for the weekend, over which Bryan and Darrow sparred through the press and tensions mounted.
It was to a packed courthouse on Monday that arguments began by the defense working to establish the scientific validity of evolution, while the prosecution focused on the Butler Act as an education standard for Tennessee citizens, citing precedents. The statement Darrow made is considered an example of his best passionate public speaking.
He spoke for over two hours. The trial itself began on Wednesday with opening statements. Witnesses followed, establishing that Scopes had taught evolution and zoologist Maynard M. Metcalf gave expert testimony about the science of evolution, a signal that Scopes himself would not take the stand during the trial. Subsequent days saw prosecutors argue about the validity of using expert witnesses. This provided Bryan with the opportunity for an extended speech on the subject.
Defense attorney Dudley Field Malone then countered with a speech of his own and received a thunderous standing ovation. The next day, the judge ruled that any experts on the stands could be cross-examined.
That night, Darrow quietly prepared to call Bryan as an expert witness on the Bible. Calling Bryan to the stand was a shock for the court. Darrow interrogated him on interpreting the Bible literally, which undercut his earlier sweeping religious speeches. This prevented Bryan from making a closing statement. After the trial, Bryan immediately began to prepare his unused closing statement as a speech for his rallies. He never got to use that speech, since he died in his sleep in Dayton the following Sunday.
Scopes was offered a new teaching contract but chose to leave Dayton and study geology at the University of Chicago graduate school. He eventually became a petroleum engineer. Supporters of both sides claimed victory following the trial, but the Butler Act was upheld, and the anti-evolution movement continued.
The adversarial system assumes that the best way to get to the truth of a matter is through a competitive process to determine the facts and application of the law accurately. The inquisitorial system is associated with civil law legal systems, and it has existed for many centuries. It is characterized by extensive pre-trial investigation and interrogations with the objective to avoid bringing an innocent person to trial.
The inquisitorial process can be described as an official inquiry to ascertain the truth, whereas the adversarial system uses a competitive process between prosecution and defence to determine the facts. The inquisitorial process grants more power to the judge who oversees the process, whereas the judge in the adversarial system serves more as an arbiter between claims of the prosecution and defence Dammer and Albanese, ; Reichel, Both these systems have variations around the world, as different countries have modified their criminal procedure in various ways over the years in balancing the interests of the State in apprehending and adjudicating offenders with the interests of individual citizens who may be caught up in the legal process.
As this Module will show, these different legal traditions impact the ways in which criminal cases are investigated and prosecuted. Doha Declaration. Education for Justice. What is Good Governance? Contemporary issues relating to conditions conducive both to the spread of terrorism and the rule of law Topic 2.
Contemporary issues relating to the right to life Topic 3. Contemporary issues relating to foreign terrorist fighters Topic 4. Definition of Crime Prevention 2. Key Crime Prevention Typologies 2. Crime Problem-Solving Approaches 4. Identifying the Need for Legal Aid 3. Models for Delivering Legal Aid Services 7. Roles and Responsibilities of Legal Aid Providers 8.
0コメント